Utah excludes central bank digital currency from the definition of money – what does it mean for the future of finance?
The Utah Legislature Excludes Central Bank Digital Currency from the Definition of Money
The Utah State Legislature recently passed House Bill 164, which has significant implications for the role of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). This law clearly defines CBDC as a digital currency issued by the Federal Reserve System or a foreign government, and then excludes it from the definition of money in the state of Utah.
The Legislature’s Decision Casts Doubt on the Legality of CBDC as a Means of Payment in the State
House Bill 164 now awaits the decision of Utah’s Governor, Spencer Cox. If signed, Utah will be the first state in the USA to explicitly exclude CBDC from the definition of money. This decision could set a precedent for other states and introduce certain complications in the context of a national digital currency.
Debates on the Role of CBDC Still Ongoing, Utah Defines Its Position
There is currently a heated debate on the role of Central Bank Digital Currencies in the future of finance. Through the adoption of House Bill 164, Utah stands out with a clear stance on this issue. Opponents of the bill argue that a state’s change in the definition of money does not necessarily prevent the federal government from introducing CBDC, citing the issue of supremacy.
State vs. Federal Authority – A Key Issue
State actions against Central Bank Digital Currency reveal the complex relations between state and federal authorities. Those involved in this process seek to protect the interests of citizens and control the financial landscape. In the era of the digital revolution, the boundaries between technology and humanity are becoming increasingly blurred, making Utah’s decision a significant moment in the evolution of monetary dynamics.
