Partners:

Quark
Polskie Stowarzyszenie Bitcoin

North Carolina blocks CBDC USA: What does it mean for the rest of the country?

North Carolina House of Representatives passes a bill banning CBDC USA, sparking bipartisan support. The decision resonates with other states opposing CBDC. Federal Reserve stance remains cautious, emphasizing the need for congressional mandate. The move may influence the national discourse on digital currencies. Monitoring developments at state and federal levels is crucial.

2 August 2024 | 00:02

North Carolina: House of Representatives Passes Bill Banning CBDC USA

In recent days, a significant development regarding the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) USA has taken place in the state of North Carolina. The House of Representatives passed a bill aiming to block the testing and acceptance of CBDC in the state. This decision comes after Governor Roy Cooper vetoed the bill, which was then overridden by the House of Representatives.

Reaction and Political Divide

The bill received substantial bipartisan support among representatives from different political parties. The voting results were decisive, with a bipartisan majority approving the ban on testing and accepting CBDC in North Carolina. The Republican Party, which dominates the North Carolina General Assembly, stands firmly against the introduction of CBDC in the state.

Arguments For and Against

One of the main arguments against the introduction of CBDC USA revolves around limiting choice before fully understanding its implications. State Representative Mary Belk argued that there is no need to react to something that has not been thoroughly researched yet.

A Signal for Other States

North Carolina joins other states such as Utah, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Louisiana in opposing the introduction of CBDC USA. This decision may serve as a signal for other regions expressing their concerns or opinions on this matter.

Situation at the Federal Level

Despite efforts by some states, the Federal Reserve maintains the position that it will not introduce CBDC without a clear mandate from Congress. At the same time, there have been bills introduced in the US Congress aimed at regulating CBDC issues, indicating a growing interest and discussion at the federal level.

It is worth noting that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell highlighted the lack of new information regarding CBDC USA following the Federal Open Market Committee meeting, which could impact further discussions on the introduction of digital currency.

Summary

The decision of the North Carolina House of Representatives regarding the ban on testing and accepting CBDC USA represents a significant step in the debate on digital currencies. Arguments for and against are coming from various sides, and the situation in North Carolina may be a factor shaping the future of CBDC in the USA. It is important to monitor the situation, both at the state and federal levels, to better understand the potential consequences of introducing the Central Bank Digital Currency.